al283 wrote:
On sl show,Scott said that gaz had a deal to cover while he was out - so I figure that to be 3 games of which Friday is the last. Bonus that Scottie now clear to play.
So...
wrencat1873 wrote:
I'm loving that the "new" defence for Wigan's wrong doing is because Wakefield won their appeal 19 years ago, so " it's only right that we get our 2 points back".
Here''s...
Hangerman2 wrote:
From when i started watching Fartown (under Murphy) we were a club on the up. We stalled when we hit Superleague for a few years, but after relegation started climbing again and very nearly hit the heights.
Wildmoggy wrote:
Well the way we have played since the London non event I would hope we could overcome them, no disrespect, whatever team they put out, but as the London game proved, I think on 'their' particular day, anyone can turn anyone over.
Wildmoggy wrote:
Well the way we have played since the London non event I would hope we could overcome them, no disrespect, whatever team they put out, but as the London game proved, I think on 'their' particular day, anyone can turn anyone over.
chapylad wrote:
I don't think anyone is suggesting we get rid of him.
But before his injury and this season he has been poor by his standards and that includes several of his performances for England.
northernbloke wrote:
Beds bronco, it’s the problem with rugby league in the south. For some fans it’s in the blood! Call it born and bred if you want, for others it’s a sport they came into later.
Greville wrote:
I can see the sentimental pull of the GB brand for the Ashes if it ever gets properly reestablished. I can even see an argument for all elite tours (home and away) being GB and England being used solely for the WC (to enable filler from the home nations)...
