rubber duckie wrote:
I don't think you are. I cannot for the life of me see this squad anywhere near the top 5, and I said so before a ball was kicked..in fact I said bottom 4 and holding around relegation....and I don't blame Lam...
Morvan wrote:
You could substitute "York" for most clubs in both leagues, especially Leigh. I didn't see York begging for players at the end of the season. Yes they've had their fair share of problems like everybody else.
Mild Rover wrote:
If it is a choice, I much prefer winning to playing an attractive brand of rugby, no doubt about that.
I think, simply, the overall quality of our squads dropped after Morgan left, relative to the rest of SL.
CIRENCESTER 1XV v DURSLEY
VENUE: THE WHITEWAY
COMPETITION: GLOUCESTERSHIRE ONE
MEET TIME: 12.45PM / KO: 2.30pm
fun time frankie wrote:
We did take some hammerings under Morgan like against Saints etc but we did have some class overseas players the like of we’ll probably not see again in the same side...
homme vaste wrote:
So what is the point in touch judges and the in goal who are both stood within a metre of that try looking from different angles? Fair enough it was on TV so he had the luxury of a video referee there just to make sure but he handed it up as a no try?
Him wrote:
The “it’s ok until they run out of cash” argument could be levelled at any club in RL that doesn’t run a profit. Which narrows it down to basically Leeds and maybe Warrington and Saints.