Wakefield City wrote:
If a deal is signed off that enables the City of Wakefield to have a fit for purpose stadium then there maybe no need to oppose.
Up the Trin
HXSparky wrote:
None at all, and that wasn't what I was saying. I was (perhaps badly) just saying that TO have built organically rather than "buying" a team as TWP have done, which seems a far more sustainable way of establishing a successful club.
knockon wrote:
Dont talk so stupid a must win game .just support your team and back them if we lose we lose the win will come , dont jump on the wagon of some of these so called supporters who think they no better than the leeds coaching staff...
Karen wrote:
Not first hand, no, as I was in the car before I knew what was happening. I was appalled and ashamed that day and every single idiot on that pitch should have been banned for life.
morrisseyisawire wrote:
BMM hasn't been fit since the day he first signed and his performances have sufferred as a result.
We aren't short on backrowers - ship him out to Rochdale for a month because trying to play top level rugby whilst 70% doesn't do him...
