Wildmoggy wrote:
I get what you are saying, but how do you 'want' teams to score tries against us?! Unless you think we are going to nil everyone every week! Obviously conceding 8, to the supposed weakest side, is slightly alarming first up no doubt.
morleys_deckchair wrote:
The thing i really liked about Austin, was the obvious threat he posed to the line... You could see the leeds defenders not knowing if they should be backing off him...
robinrovers10 wrote:
Just seen his statistics for the Derby and cannot believe the engine on this kid. 57 tackles only 2 missed, however on the flip side he only managed 7 scoots/carries making 57 meters.
Bullseye wrote:
I think Hitchcox was a bit patchy really. One of the breaks came when Lilley’s pass went to nobody and the defence was wrong footed. That said he did really well to make...
LyndsayGill wrote:
By your logic and on the basis that they've all lost one game then, Wigan, Leeds, Hull and Huddersfield won't be top four contenders either. Wakefield were crap yesterday but come back nearer the end of the season and see how the League table looks.
Well that was an excitig start ot this great competition!
Results in!
FRA 17 - 24 WAL
SCO 33 - 20 ITA
IRE 20 - 32 ENG
Just a reminder that we will be showing ALL the games in the clubhouse!
SYDNEY - The Blitzbokke's inconsistent performance at the Sydney leg of the HSBC World Rugby Sevens at the weekend, meant that no South African was included in the prestigious Dream Team.
wire-quin wrote:
Is it really that bad? It was clear to see the stand behind the sticks isn't finished. Once that's done the ground will cater for the small support we have, whilst also catering for away fans.