Warrington Wolves • Re: Todays Game
matt_wire wrote:
True that. I’ve said for a few years, we always seem to score out wide. Having prolific wingers is actually a bit of a double edged sword. Regular tries, but difficult goals.
matt_wire wrote:
True that. I’ve said for a few years, we always seem to score out wide. Having prolific wingers is actually a bit of a double edged sword. Regular tries, but difficult goals.
GiantJake1988 wrote:
I think Sams time will come in another couple of years. Some players take a little longer to develop physically and I think he will in time. Hes still only 21... I think...
bren2k wrote:
Not really - it's dismissed by sensible people because there isn't a stadium to share, and no realistic expectation of one being available any time in the medium-long term future, so the argument is moot.
sally cinnamon wrote:
I agree with duckie on this. The era of rugby league which I remember most fondly coincided with the era Wigan dominated. Usual thinking is that you want an even and competitive league to create interest with some changing of the guard at the top...
Sal Paradise wrote:
If I were May I would simply threaten a GE if the Tory MPs don't come to there senses. A number will lose their seats especially if May is the Tory leader going into the GE.
Ruune Rebellion wrote:
A week to go and still no sponsor. Even the U.K. pro netball league has a mainstream sponsor.
Just shows how far rugby league has fallen
pmarrow wrote:
I dont think it matters how we start the season it'll be the same thing come the end of it, with the arm chair coaches wanting Radford out. We could win the first 10 lose 1 and everyone would want him gone.