Him wrote:
Even if Carter was appointed by the other SL chairmen to look into RFL expenditure. That doesn’t equate to him artificially raising the price of Bradford’s lease.
The fact Hudgell is involved as well points to more than just ensuring financial probity at the RFL.
al283 wrote:
On a positive note - the numbers of forwards we now have SHOULD ensure players aren't over played or play carrying injuries. A fit Westerman is effectively a new signing who really adds an attacking threat.
moto748 wrote:
Yeah, have to say, I can't agree with that either, except I share your relatively low opinion of Morgan. I remember watching him when he was at the Eels, and he always looked very ordinary to me.
jumper wrote:
No Ikihihifo?
Shifty Cat wrote:
They do but tbf it usually isn't the case. Leeds, in particular, used to regularly rest quite a few, generally because of them having players on international duties and let their younger players play and we did similar to a lesser extent.
Willzay wrote:
Why don't you keep to watching Yawnion then King James, Yawnion troll.
Burtons Forearm wrote:
Dagger
Vaivai
Linnett
Kienhorst
Hall
McGuire
Altkin
Scruton
Lunt
Masoe
Tomkins
Hauraki
Mulhern
Garbutt
Lawler
Addy...
Upanunder wrote:
No, I don't go with the redevelopment of Belle Vue thing either, its a bit too restrictive, its not the site you'd choose if you were starting from scratch.
Having said that...
Pumpetypump wrote:
What is "on the cheap" though? Are they going to contrive a market value by offering an amount higher than the RFL valuation?
And if the RFL called their bluff and sold it to them, could they be the landlord of another club?