PopTart wrote:
I actually said he'd developed this part of his game.
I also said his attack is as good if not better than anyone.
So to use your oft used phrase, maybe you should go back and reread my post.
Jake the Peg wrote:
I don't disagree with the decision but I'm not sure we should be allowing a player to start pre season then paying him off. We surely knew some time before he wasn't in...
Trinity_lurcher wrote:
He has got such an all round game. Safe under the high ball, excellent tackler and great at organising our line.
His pace also surprised me. He chased back a few times last year to stop a certain try.
Listenup94 wrote:
Whats the agenda? I'm not chucking mud im pointing out that the members of the working group have been chucking mud at the rugby club on a public forum for years and therefore should remove themselves from the group.
MattyB wrote:
I agree the atmosphere and increase in attendances were incredible as each game came and went. Not sure any other team before or since has had such an instance of this. I think...
The Cooke Report wrote:
FWIW money into a club is the tip of the iceberg. There is only circa £2 million to spend on cap and the less desirable clubs ie bottom half have to spend heavy to get their man.
A RUGBY league player has received a 20-YEAR ban after allegedly hitting a referee.
