MorningGlory23 wrote:
As far as Wigan teams go, I’d say that’s the poorest one I’ve seen in a long time, not sure I’d have any of them in the Hull team, Hardaker maybe, although he’s not set the world alight.
MonkeyLover wrote:
whatever his name is post page after page of nasty comments about the owner of a club he claims to support. I say claims to support because when offered the chance to showcase his 'talents' to the club he demanded hospitality for his family to attend a game.
The Dentist Wilf wrote:
Now can I say that your comment is spot on for me, I've been saying for weeks, we seem happy to let most teams put 60 odd yards on us in any given set of six so they...
Levrier wrote:
If you read the Canberra Raiders forum " The greenhouse" you will see that they are not overly impressed with Sezer. The feeling is that he is only playing for a new contract.
Father Ted wrote:
I agree it's a short turnaround and is very unfair on your lads as well as us lot who wanted to travel.
Whether Wigan are a poor team is for you to judge as I being a Wigan fan will just read your and appreciate your opinions.
Him wrote:
Oh come on. You don’t think the sporting and social landscape has changed in 65 years?
I think Fax can be bigger than they are of course with some investment and some success...
NickyKiss wrote:
The Fax players had been working on building sites and farms in the intense heat all week and you struggled to put them away. Using excuses like ‘it was raining’ or ‘we were...
