Is Kash Patel’s fate sealed after Kirk shooting missteps?

Less than a year into his tenure atop the nation’s premier federal law enforcement agency, FBI Director Kash Patel finds himself once again in a crouch. This time following the shooting death of far-right provocateur and activist Charlie Kirk last week. Patel was already hampered with criticism — and a recently filed lawsuit — over his heavy-handed partisan leadership at the agency to date. Now, he faces increasing calls for accountability after a series of high-profile blunders during the early stages of the Kirk investigation. Despite public support from President Donald Trump, Patel’s place in this administration is in as precarious a place as it’s ever been amidst bipartisan calls for answers.

What did the commentators say?

Patel’s “false assurance” in the immediate aftermath of the shooting that a “suspect” was in custody — an assertion allegedly made while he was dining at an exclusive NYC restaurant, only to be reversed shortly thereafter — was “more than a slip,” said The Associated Press. Rather, the incident draws attention to the “high-stakes uncertainty surrounding Patel’s leadership” when both the FBI's credibility and his own are “under extraordinary pressure.”

Nevertheless, Trump himself is “defending the embattled bureau director,” even as Patel is peppered by growing criticism from “former and current officials in the bureau” and “prominent MAGA allies online” as well, said Politico. “I am very proud of the FBI,” Trump said to Fox News on Saturday. “Kash, and everyone else, they have done a great job.” Broadly, Trump “doesn’t seem concerned” with the furor over Patel’s leadership, said Semafor, which noted that the president and Patel met this weekend while golfing at Trump’s Bedminster club. The conversation between the two “went very well,” said a source to Semafor’s Shelby Talcott.

All this comes at a “perilous time” for Patel, as the FBI prepares to swear in former Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey as co-Deputy Director, an unprecedented position within the agency that has “not been explained and left FBI leadership confused,” Fox News said. The White House, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy AG Todd Blanche have “no confidence in Kash,” one source with “knowledge of ongoing personnel discussions” said to the network. “Pam in particular cannot stand him. Blanche either.”

Long the purview of Trump critics at-large, concerns about Patel’s fitness to lead the FBI have now begun “seeping into conservative circles that Patel is a fixture of,” said CNN. It’s time for conservatives to “assess whether Kash Patel is the right man” to lead the FBI, prominent right wing activist Christopher Rufo said on X. Rufo said that he’s been “on the phone the last few days with many conservative leaders,” all of whom support the White House but lack confidence that the “current structure of the FBI is up to this task.”

What next?

Despite the White House’s public support for its FBI director, there are indications that Patel and his inner circle may be beginning to feel the heat. One day after “hastily suggesting” and then walking back initial claims that they had the Kirk shooter in custody, Patel and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino hosted a 200-person call among FBI officials, making clear that they were “under intense pressure to catch the killer,” The New York Times said. But for attendees of the “tense affair,” the “fierce urgency” with which Patel and Bongino vulgarly expressed themselves during the meeting hinted at “another motive,” the Times said: to “prove they were up to the task.”

Next, Patel and his team will likely have to once again make that argument — this time not to the FBI rank and file, but rather to members of the Congressional Oversight Committee, where Patel is slated to testify this week. While the FBI has not publicly commented on his pending remarks, the appearance offers the director his “most consequential stage yet,” said the AP. It’s also the “clearest test of whether he can convince the country that the FBI, under his watch, can avoid compounding its mistakes” in this tumultuous era.

For now, Patel’s tenure seems relatively secure, with the Administration suggesting that any criticism of the director is mere partisanship. Those doubting Patel’s “resolve and dedication,” said White House Communications Director Steven Cheung to Semafor, are simply “using this extremely sad moment in a disgusting act of political gamesmanship.”