Wakefield Trinity • Re: New Stadium Updates
New document added today on the Newmarket Application,
I’ve posted the relevant information. good news that it’s another None Objection for the Newmarket site.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
From: Woffenden, Frances <FWoffenden@wakefield.gov.uk> Sent: 26 October 2021 16:16
To: Eaglestone, Michael <meaglestone@wakefield.gov.uk> Subject: 20/02249/FUL Plot 8 Newmarket Lane Wakefield
Michael
I have reviewed the new information. On the whole it is a vast improvement and EH would not object to this scheme in principle in terms of design and layout.
The ES addendum has updated the noise assessment to some extent, so updated information in terms of BS4142 has been provided at the original 4 noise sensitive receptors but it has not accounted for the receptor to the south east on Bottomboat Road (this receptor was not of concern with the original plans as they were screened from the service yard by the buildings)
The applicants have provided an updated noise model which indicates the south east receptor would not be subject to adverse impact in . However this does not provide reassurance for the type of noise arising from the service yard area. The plan below indicates that the service yard and car park are elevated above the surroundings and it would be helpful to see a section from the service yard to the receptor. Given the general increase in noise which will inevitably be associated with the overall development in this location and the specific type of noise from service yards, I consider it reasonable to ask that the south east corner of the service yard has acoustic screening. I understand that the service yard to the adjoining development will also have this type of mitigation incorporated in the design.
With regard to the properties to the north of the site and the impact of the Unit 1 service yard, the sections they have provided don’t extend to the properties and I cannot tell what screening the topography provides. If it is relatively flat them my recommendation would be for acoustic fencing along the northern edge of the service yard. Given that they are already subject to additional noise at the back of their properties from the relocation of Newmarket Lane any additional impact from the plot 8 development should be mitigated as far as possible.
Please can you raise these issues with the developer.
Kind regards Frances
Frances Woffenden
Team Manager – Community Protection Environmental Health
Wakefield Council
fwoffenden@wakefield.gov.uk
Tel 0345 8 506 506 Mob 07810 152583 http://www.wakefield.gov.uk
I’ve posted the relevant information. good news that it’s another None Objection for the Newmarket site.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
From: Woffenden, Frances <FWoffenden@wakefield.gov.uk> Sent: 26 October 2021 16:16
To: Eaglestone, Michael <meaglestone@wakefield.gov.uk> Subject: 20/02249/FUL Plot 8 Newmarket Lane Wakefield
Michael
I have reviewed the new information. On the whole it is a vast improvement and EH would not object to this scheme in principle in terms of design and layout.
The ES addendum has updated the noise assessment to some extent, so updated information in terms of BS4142 has been provided at the original 4 noise sensitive receptors but it has not accounted for the receptor to the south east on Bottomboat Road (this receptor was not of concern with the original plans as they were screened from the service yard by the buildings)
The applicants have provided an updated noise model which indicates the south east receptor would not be subject to adverse impact in . However this does not provide reassurance for the type of noise arising from the service yard area. The plan below indicates that the service yard and car park are elevated above the surroundings and it would be helpful to see a section from the service yard to the receptor. Given the general increase in noise which will inevitably be associated with the overall development in this location and the specific type of noise from service yards, I consider it reasonable to ask that the south east corner of the service yard has acoustic screening. I understand that the service yard to the adjoining development will also have this type of mitigation incorporated in the design.
With regard to the properties to the north of the site and the impact of the Unit 1 service yard, the sections they have provided don’t extend to the properties and I cannot tell what screening the topography provides. If it is relatively flat them my recommendation would be for acoustic fencing along the northern edge of the service yard. Given that they are already subject to additional noise at the back of their properties from the relocation of Newmarket Lane any additional impact from the plot 8 development should be mitigated as far as possible.
Please can you raise these issues with the developer.
Kind regards Frances
Frances Woffenden
Team Manager – Community Protection Environmental Health
Wakefield Council
fwoffenden@wakefield.gov.uk
Tel 0345 8 506 506 Mob 07810 152583 http://www.wakefield.gov.uk
Statistics: Posted by Dunkirk Spirit — Thu Nov 04, 2021 4:02 pm