Rugby
Add news
News

The Sin Bin • Re: Brexit Anyone? (part 4)

Sal Paradise wrote:

May was a disaster but if her position was the agreed majority within the Tory party it should have been supported - sadly I am not sure she had a majority for her vision of Brexit. Let's face she was much more of a dictator than Boris - the Tory manifesto was her and her two advisors, the 2017 campaign was all her doing and the Brexit negotiations were all her no discussions within the party on any of that.

So you actually think it would be OK for Corbyn to form a government and implement things like re-nationalisation without an election? really wow!!

To me all Johnson is trying to do is deliver Brexit - he knows he could never get it through parliament MP's have shown no appetite for a deal and no appetite for no deal so how does he deliver on the referendum.

Fortunately it would appear the notion of an impending recession has been overblown given July's growth figures. Time for a GE - perhaps this is more to do with why Labour don't want a GE - No deal Brexit is a convenient excuse - and you say Boris has no integrity!!


No party can pass ANY law without the majority of MP's voting for it, not even Corbyn.
In fairness, even when the Tories cam into power, they didn't have an overall majority but, you seem happy enough for them to team up with the DUP and "rule" over the country WOW.-( I dont remember that option being on any ballet paper or even being muted during the election campaign, do you ?).
Had Mrs May not got into bed with her Irish friends, Corbyn, if he thought he could muster a coalition with an overall majority could have tried to form a government and in that respect, little has changed.
In fact, you could argue that having sacked 21 of his own MP's and with it, his very slim majority, Boris shouldn't have the right to govern anyway.
Now, in minority government, he's is doing everything possible to force the population to accept something that Parliament has passed a law to forbid, not bad for the new party in favour of law and order, eh

If the government is happy to ride roughshod all over the law, then, why the hell should the populous be expected to stay within it.
As usual, two sets of rules. One for the lawmakers and one for the riff raff. It's a fecking joke.

Statistics: Posted by wrencat1873 — Mon Sep 09, 2019 4:42 pm


Comments

Комментарии для сайта Cackle
Загрузка...

More news:

Read on Sportsweek.org:

Other sports

Sponsored