Hull FC - blackandwhites.co.uk • Re: Watts sending off
TheElectricGlidingWarrior wrote:
I've read it. They do not say the elbow was not raised, because of course it was. As anyone can see the arm moves away from Watts' body and into MM's jaw. The RFL decision was to charge Watts and to consider the sending off sufficient, which clearly supports the on field decision, you know, the opposite of proving it wrong. I understood this, it seems you did not, despite it not being joined up writing, as you say. Thanks for the laugh though. Perhaps next time you want to try and be a smart booty you'll make sure you understand what you're talking about before insinuating someone else doesn't.
Reading really is not your strong point.
"Elbow and forearm of player are not promoted."
Promoted is a synonym for raised, lead, elevated, advanced... Need I go on?
Statistics: Posted by Wellsy13 — Mon Sep 11, 2017 10:57 pm

