Could Michael Carrick face a ban for VAR rant after Man United loss to Leeds?

Manchester United suffered a dismal 2-1 to Leeds United in the Premier League on Monday evening.

Two early goals from Noah Okafor caught Man United off guard, as they were returning to action after 24 days.

Casemiro gave the hosts late hope with a powerful header, but only after Lisandro Martinez had been sent off for controversially pulling the bobble from Dominic Calvert-Lewin’s hair.

Two major decisions went against the Red Devils, leaving both fans and head coach Michael Carrick furious.

The former England international did not hold back, launching a scathing attack on the officials after the final whistle. You can read his full comments on the VAR controversy here.

FA Rule E3 prohibits any player, manager or club official from making post-match comments that imply bias or question the integrity of a match official.

Could Carrick now face disciplinary action for his outspoken comments?

The FA may well review the incident, with the possibility of a suspension looming over the United manager.

Carrick strongly hit out at the officials but was he justified in his criticism? There is certainly a strong case to suggest he was.

While the Premier League is widely regarded as the best domestic competition in world football, the standard of refereeing continues to come under intense scrutiny.

VAR should have intervened and not allowed Leeds’ first goal to stand. Dominic Calvert-Lewin clearly elbowed Leny Yoro in the build-up.

While elbowing was not considered a foul, Lisandro Martinez was handed a straight red card for pulling the bobble from Calvert-Lewin’s hair.

His conduct was not violent and did not cause any harm. Ironically, Calvert-Lewin swung his arm into Martinez’s neck in the incident.

The two players moved on without creating a fuss but VAR wanted the limelight.

Marco Silva was handed a one-game touchline ban and a £90,000 fine following Fulham’s defeat to West Ham United.

However, Silva directly referenced referee John Brooks in his criticism, whereas Carrick’s comments were more general in nature.

We believe the FA may opt for a lighter punishment, such as a warning or fine, rather than a suspension.

Article written by Sanidhya Bhardwaj .