World Rugby set to lower elite games tackle height
0
35
The legal tackle height is to be lowered globally across all elite rugby, despite a growing revolt against plans to roll out the most seismic changes to the way the game is played since it turned professional. The chief executive of World Rugby, Alan Gilpin, confirmed on Thursday that it planned to follow the Rugby Football Unions lead in rewriting its rules on an issue that has left the sport bitterly divided.
But, in an exclusive interview, he also said the likelihood was that the legal tackle height in the international and professional club game, which is at shoulder level, would not be lowered as far as the waist.
The RFU decision to ban tackling above the waist in the community game in England provoked outrage, but Gilpin gave it a ringing endorsement and said other countries were set to follow suit.
He also confirmed World Rugby was planning to stage a global law trial from January 1, 2024, initially at amateur level, with a decision yet to be made over whether that would involve a prohibition on tackles above the waist or the sternum.
Unlike the RFU law change, which takes effect from next season, any change to the legal tackle height at the top end of the sport would not come any earlier than the 2024-25 season, and may not even be in place until after the 2027 World Cup.
Yes, were looking to make sure that we are implementing a lower tackle height across all parts of the game, Gilpin said. How thats actually implemented is slightly different in the community game to the elite game.
Youre in a slightly different environment, for a number of reasons, in the elite part of the game, particularly at an international level, because the level of for example medical provision, diagnostic ability etc, is very different. We obviously have television match officials, head injury assessment, the ability for immediate pitch-side care in all elite-level rugby that you dont have in the community game.
Weve got to recognise that theyre not the same sport.
The RFU has stood firm over its ban on tackles above the waist, which its council refused to consult the wider game on before voting for. So fierce has been the backlash from those affected that Bill Sweeney, the governing bodys chief executive, and its board are in danger of facing a vote of no confidence. But Gilpin defended the ban, which was announced against a background of the latest wave of legal action against World Rugby and the RFU by former players with dementia or other brain disorders.
The RFU, obviously, is in the process of implementing some changes around tackle height that we support, he said.
Because we know, from all of the research and science and medicine, that lowering the tackle height is a really important part of making the game safer.
Theres a lot of work to do to educate people. But weve got to, as a sport, try to find that really difficult but hugely important balance between safety, but making the game entertaining to watch.
Its not binary. Its not one or the other. Its how do we make the game safer and a better spectacle to watch and a better game to play?
Its tough because its a really, really complex message to deliver. On one level, its very simple. We know from all the research thats been done, and it is incredibly comprehensive, youre four-and-a-half times more likely to sustain a head injury when you tackle from an upright position than when the tackler is bent at the waist.
We need to get players tackling lower at every part of the game. Obviously, theres an elite part of the game where were doing a huge amount of work, and weve used sanctions, and red cards in particular, trying to drive changes in behaviour.
When you look at the community game, its challenging to roll that out on a global basis.
It requires significant buy-in from the game in different parts of the world.
Youll always have the traditionalists, I guess, who understandably say, Stop tweaking things and dont change too much, because were really concerned about losing the inherent fabric of the sport and we all absolutely get that. At the same time, weve got to make sure that we are attracting people to the sport that is safe to play, or is as safe to play as a sport thats a contact one can be.
Theres always work to do in implementing change and how you can consult around change and how you communicate and educate around change. But the key message is, lets get the tackle height lower at every level of the game because that will reduce absolutely reduce the number of head injuries that we see in rugby.
Thats really important if, again, were going to win the battle for the hearts and minds of not just the young people we want to play the game, boys and girls, but the mums and dads who may be concerned about injuries in rugby.
So, weve got a responsibility from a World Rugby perspective, to work hard with our member federations around the world.
That communication challenge is tougher in places where rugbys got a long heritage and history and is played in significant numbers, and thats what the RFU is experiencing in this last week or so.
Gilpins declaration comes as momentum is building towards a vote of no confidence in RFU chief executive Sweeney, with close to 250 clubs now in support of a special general meeting in the wake of the governing bodys move to implement new tackle laws.
Community Clubs Union, an independent organisation launched in response to last weeks announcement, has spearheaded the campaign. They are hoping in the coming days to reach final sign-off on a letter requesting the special general meeting, which requires the support of at least 100 members of the union, and are coordinating the process of collecting letters from each dissenting club, which must be signed by a chairperson and a secretary.
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/rugby-u...27-p5cfu9.html
But, in an exclusive interview, he also said the likelihood was that the legal tackle height in the international and professional club game, which is at shoulder level, would not be lowered as far as the waist.
The RFU decision to ban tackling above the waist in the community game in England provoked outrage, but Gilpin gave it a ringing endorsement and said other countries were set to follow suit.
He also confirmed World Rugby was planning to stage a global law trial from January 1, 2024, initially at amateur level, with a decision yet to be made over whether that would involve a prohibition on tackles above the waist or the sternum.
Unlike the RFU law change, which takes effect from next season, any change to the legal tackle height at the top end of the sport would not come any earlier than the 2024-25 season, and may not even be in place until after the 2027 World Cup.
Yes, were looking to make sure that we are implementing a lower tackle height across all parts of the game, Gilpin said. How thats actually implemented is slightly different in the community game to the elite game.
Youre in a slightly different environment, for a number of reasons, in the elite part of the game, particularly at an international level, because the level of for example medical provision, diagnostic ability etc, is very different. We obviously have television match officials, head injury assessment, the ability for immediate pitch-side care in all elite-level rugby that you dont have in the community game.
Weve got to recognise that theyre not the same sport.
The RFU has stood firm over its ban on tackles above the waist, which its council refused to consult the wider game on before voting for. So fierce has been the backlash from those affected that Bill Sweeney, the governing bodys chief executive, and its board are in danger of facing a vote of no confidence. But Gilpin defended the ban, which was announced against a background of the latest wave of legal action against World Rugby and the RFU by former players with dementia or other brain disorders.
The RFU, obviously, is in the process of implementing some changes around tackle height that we support, he said.
Because we know, from all of the research and science and medicine, that lowering the tackle height is a really important part of making the game safer.
Theres a lot of work to do to educate people. But weve got to, as a sport, try to find that really difficult but hugely important balance between safety, but making the game entertaining to watch.
Its not binary. Its not one or the other. Its how do we make the game safer and a better spectacle to watch and a better game to play?
Its tough because its a really, really complex message to deliver. On one level, its very simple. We know from all the research thats been done, and it is incredibly comprehensive, youre four-and-a-half times more likely to sustain a head injury when you tackle from an upright position than when the tackler is bent at the waist.
We need to get players tackling lower at every part of the game. Obviously, theres an elite part of the game where were doing a huge amount of work, and weve used sanctions, and red cards in particular, trying to drive changes in behaviour.
When you look at the community game, its challenging to roll that out on a global basis.
It requires significant buy-in from the game in different parts of the world.
Youll always have the traditionalists, I guess, who understandably say, Stop tweaking things and dont change too much, because were really concerned about losing the inherent fabric of the sport and we all absolutely get that. At the same time, weve got to make sure that we are attracting people to the sport that is safe to play, or is as safe to play as a sport thats a contact one can be.
Theres always work to do in implementing change and how you can consult around change and how you communicate and educate around change. But the key message is, lets get the tackle height lower at every level of the game because that will reduce absolutely reduce the number of head injuries that we see in rugby.
Thats really important if, again, were going to win the battle for the hearts and minds of not just the young people we want to play the game, boys and girls, but the mums and dads who may be concerned about injuries in rugby.
So, weve got a responsibility from a World Rugby perspective, to work hard with our member federations around the world.
That communication challenge is tougher in places where rugbys got a long heritage and history and is played in significant numbers, and thats what the RFU is experiencing in this last week or so.
Gilpins declaration comes as momentum is building towards a vote of no confidence in RFU chief executive Sweeney, with close to 250 clubs now in support of a special general meeting in the wake of the governing bodys move to implement new tackle laws.
Community Clubs Union, an independent organisation launched in response to last weeks announcement, has spearheaded the campaign. They are hoping in the coming days to reach final sign-off on a letter requesting the special general meeting, which requires the support of at least 100 members of the union, and are coordinating the process of collecting letters from each dissenting club, which must be signed by a chairperson and a secretary.
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/rugby-u...27-p5cfu9.html