The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Thursday 10th July) Newcastle demand £15m for Longstaff
Good Morning. It's Thursday 10th July, and here are the latest headlines from Elland Road...
Newcastle demand £15m for Longstaff
Leeds pursuit of Newcastle United's versatile midfielder Sean Longstaff has hit the rocks, with the Tyneside outfit firmly rejecting the Whites' latest offer. Despite Leeds tabling a package worth £10 million, bolstered by a further £2 million in add-ons, Newcastle have dug in their heels, now demanding a £15 million for the 27-year-old.
Crucially, sources indicate that Leeds had already successfully agreed personal terms with Longstaff, suggesting the player himself is keen on a move to Elland Road. This makes Newcastle's resolute stance particularly frustrating for the West Yorkshire outfit. Longstaff, who is in the final year of his contract, saw limited game time for the Magpies last season, often finding himself on the fringes of Eddie Howe's plans. However, Newcastle had the foresight to activate an additional 12-month extension on his deal, protecting their asset and strengthening their negotiating position.
Leeds United's strategy this summer has been clear: to add vital experience and much-needed depth to their squad without overspending. Longstaff, with his Premier League pedigree and ability to cover multiple midfield roles, perfectly fits this mould. However, the disparity between Leeds' valuation and Newcastle's now seemingly firm £15 million demand presents a significant hurdle.
This latest rejection leaves Leeds at a crossroads. The Elland Road hierarchy must now decide whether to table a fourth, improved bid, potentially pushing closer to Newcastle's revised valuation, or to pivot their attention elsewhere in the market. The clock is ticking, and the need for reinforcements is pressing.
Interestingly, whispers from the North East suggest that any funds generated from Longstaff's sale could be earmarked by Eddie Howe for Coventry City's rising star, Jack Rudoni. Dubbed one of the finest talents outside of the top flight, Rudoni has attracted considerable attention. This development might offer Leeds an alternative target, as they "could do a lot worse than go after Rudoni themselves" should the Longstaff deal ultimately collapse.
Are Leeds behind schedule in summer recruitment drive
This is not the first time this season that Leeds have faced transfer frustrations this summer. Previous pursuits of promising young talents like Habib Diarra and Noah Sadiki ended in disappointment, with both players opting to join newly promoted Sunderland.
Whether this string of near-misses is indicative of Leeds dithering, or merely taking a more cautious approach to stay the right side of PSR, is up for debate. The capture of Chemsdine Talbi (£20m from Brugge) and imminent arrival of Simon Adingra from Brighton has taken Sunderland's spending this window to £117.5m.
In contrast, Leeds have parted with just £30m. We can expect the 49ers to spend big on a keeper and goal scorer this summer, with Rodrigo Muniz still top of Daniel Farke's wish list. With only four new faces through the door so far this transfer window, Leeds appear noticeably behind schedule in their summer recruitment drive. This will soon be forgotten if they can bring in a couple of marquee signings.
Milinkovic-Savic move unlikely
Leeds search for a new goalkeeper continues, though sources at Elland Road are now downplaying one high-profile target. Despite recent discussions taking place between Leeds and Torino, the acquisition of the towering 6ft 8in Vanja Milinkovic-Savic is now considered the most unlikely option,
Meanwhile, Olympique Lyon's summer transfer strategy could be significantly altered after winning their crucial appeal against relegation. A key player on Leeds radar is Lucas Perri, widely regarded as one of Europe's top shot-stoppers.
However, Perri comes with a significant caveat: a 50% sell-on fee owed to his former club, Botafogo. With Lyon still navigating financial difficulties, the question arises whether parting with a player of Perri's calibre, only to lose half the transfer revenue, is a viable or desirable move. This dilemma could heavily influence their approach to the market and their ability to reinvest elsewhere!