Chelski charges
0
19
[www.independent.co.uk]
I've not followed this closely but it comes as no surprise that their previous ownership were allegedly playing fast and loose with the rules.
And the current ownership's defence "it wasn't us guv - in fact we told you about this" doesn't wash with me.
If a club's been taking the piss then the club needs to face the sanction. When you take on a business you also take on responsibility for its baggage IMO.
And yes, I do get the irony in what I'm saying.
I've not followed this closely but it comes as no surprise that their previous ownership were allegedly playing fast and loose with the rules.
And the current ownership's defence "it wasn't us guv - in fact we told you about this" doesn't wash with me.
If a club's been taking the piss then the club needs to face the sanction. When you take on a business you also take on responsibility for its baggage IMO.
And yes, I do get the irony in what I'm saying.