Why is this not on the front page? STEPH CURRY is the NYT Player of the Decade!

Only today (1/7) did I find that in the Christmas issue of the New York Times, Shauntel Lowe wrote about who they named the NBA Player of the Decade. Easy peasy, LeBron James, right?

WRONG! Their choice was Wardell Stephen Curry!

I do not have to explain to GSOM why this is clearly the enlightened, correct choice. But what I will do is list the items off the top of my head that must really really REALLY cheese off the so-called "King" about the Golden One.

1. Steph's team has beaten LeBron's team in every postseason series except one. That's a 3-1 advantage, which is a 3-0 advantage for the series in which both players were healthy. I suppose you could say it's only 2-0 because LeBron's hand was broken in the last one, but that's an excuse of his own making.
2. Steph is the only player in history with a unanimous MVP.
3. Steph is given more credit for "changing the game" than LeBron by just about everyone.
4. Steph is David getting over on Goliath.
5. Steph was just named the NBA Player of the Decade by the New York Times.