Golf
Add news
News

Get a Ruling •

0 18
Mr. Bean wrote:
2:43 PM - Today
Thom wrote:
3:52 AM - Today
Mr Bean
I'm interested in the life cycle of this rules question. Where did you source it?
I notice this precise question (differences so small as to be irrelevant)was posted on the USGA facebook rules discussion site by one Michele Frasca in the last 18 hours, is that you on a transgender day  ? Or per perhaps Michele just enjoys reading this site? I have no problem at all with people copying interesting questions across discussion sites. For golf rules questions, I've long thought plagiarism is the highest form of flattery. (Confession - I'm another who contributes to multiple sites with multiple pseudonyms - although it is virtually never that I would take a question from one site to another.)
Let me start from the very beginning. A week ago I was refereeing a 2-day competition of 50+ male golfers. Amongst the participants there were quite a few from my home club of which some were disqualified for mainly having played a wrong ball and failed to find the original, and decided to go home instead of returning to the tee.

Last Thursday I met two of the participants A and B (not the ones who were dq'd) on the range and A wanted to know some rules issues regarding the dq of one particular player C. Then B said that the situation would have been different if C had invoked preferred lies while playing that wrong ball. I said that was an interesting view and said I would get into it. I called on the spot to one of our esteemed referees as well as to another but wanted to throw the issue here as well, just to get the final decision, which I did.
.
So, I am not Michele and I am not even on Facebook, so it cannot have been me.
Thanks for the interesting backstory. It seems Michele is (at least) a reader of this site and has an eye out for a tricky question.
You don't need to be on Facebook to read the material, only if you wish to post. A couple of times a week the USGA posts questions there for discussion and others also post. The quality of the discussion/contributions is uneven, my impression is there are many participants but some contributors have limited rules understanding.

statistics: Posted by Thom3:49 PM - Today


Comments

Комментарии для сайта Cackle
Загрузка...

More news:

Read on Sportsweek.org:

Other sports

Sponsored