Get a Ruling • Match Play
Good Morning to all
I would appreciate your help in resolving following problem (taken from another site):
"In an 18-hole match between A and B, A's ball strikes the flagstick which was attended by B. A immediately says to B "You didn't remove the flagstick. You are penalised loss of hole!". B answers that he is not sure that is right, so A says he is making a claim which can be heard by the Committee later. The pair therefore play out the hole, and each has four strokes.
How should the Committee decide when the claim is referred to them later? A has made a claim to win the hole, but B has not made a claim at all. Should the Committee decide that B won the hole, or that the hole was halved? "
I am asking the question because I remember having seen once a ruling from the R&A (unfortunately I can no longer find a copy) stating that once a Referee intervenes in a case, the fact that the opponent didn't submit a claim is irrelevant.
This would imply that in above situation, A would lose the hole if a Referee had intervened.
In above situation it is not a Referee that intervenes but the Committee.
My question: because the intervention emanates by the Committee and not by a Referee does it mean that the hole is halved or A would still lose the hole?
Thanks for your input and regards – JMC
Normal 0 21 false false false FR-CH X-NONE X-NONE
/* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tableau Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
I would appreciate your help in resolving following problem (taken from another site):
"In an 18-hole match between A and B, A's ball strikes the flagstick which was attended by B. A immediately says to B "You didn't remove the flagstick. You are penalised loss of hole!". B answers that he is not sure that is right, so A says he is making a claim which can be heard by the Committee later. The pair therefore play out the hole, and each has four strokes.
How should the Committee decide when the claim is referred to them later? A has made a claim to win the hole, but B has not made a claim at all. Should the Committee decide that B won the hole, or that the hole was halved? "
I am asking the question because I remember having seen once a ruling from the R&A (unfortunately I can no longer find a copy) stating that once a Referee intervenes in a case, the fact that the opponent didn't submit a claim is irrelevant.
This would imply that in above situation, A would lose the hole if a Referee had intervened.
In above situation it is not a Referee that intervenes but the Committee.
My question: because the intervention emanates by the Committee and not by a Referee does it mean that the hole is halved or A would still lose the hole?
Thanks for your input and regards – JMC
Normal 0 21 false false false FR-CH X-NONE X-NONE
/* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tableau Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
Statistics: Posted by JMC — Today, 10:11