Re: Goswami and the sad end
0
11
bluearmyfactionAnd she would have been IN the crease had it been obvious that the bowler was not about to release the ball, but was faking it. That's the paradox of the law. It's meant to be to stop people taking the piss, not a forensic analysis of inches over milliseconds. Which may be why it is so rare as a dismissal.
Read the Twitter thread. 73 (SEVENTY THREE) times. He shows she was often over two feet down the pitch. He also showed that none of the other batters at the non strikers end were doing the same thing. Surely this fits the definition of “It's meant to be to stop people taking the piss” that you use above.